Start with a defined trigger
An editor approves a topic, audience and intended reader outcome.
Editorial brief-to-reviewed draft
This is a proposed workflow pattern. We confirm data access, permissions, integration options and review ownership with your team before implementation.
Confirm roles, publishing permissions and plugin behavior. Keep draft generation separate from permission to publish or install software.
An editor approves a topic, audience and intended reader outcome.
Collect approved source material, brand guidance, page structure and the site's editorial standards.
Draft the article or page with supported claims, useful progression and clearly identified information gaps.
An editor checks accuracy and audience value. Technical changes receive separate review in an appropriate preview environment.
Save the approved content through the existing editorial process and retain source references for future updates.
Measure substantive edits, unsupported claims, publishing errors and reader-task completion rather than volume alone.
Keep the input, relevant context, review decision and final result connected. When a reviewer corrects something, use that evidence to improve the instructions or integration, then validate the change against representative cases.
The workflow stays centered on your business. The engagement determines who learns, implements and operates it.
Learn through courses, practical training and workshops. Get feedback as you apply the lessons to your own project.
Explore courses and workshops ↗Get everything in DIY, three months of workshops, weekly team sessions and direct implementation coaching.
Explore guided implementation ↗Include all the learning and guidance, with ownership of agreed operations and major implementation decisions.
Explore managed delivery ↗Looking for a course, help with a difficult problem, or someone to build a solution? Tell us where you are and what you'd like to do next.