Start with a defined trigger
A coordinator submits an approved project inquiry and available site evidence.
Site information-to-project readiness brief
This is a proposed workflow pattern. We confirm data access, permissions, integration options and review ownership with your team before implementation.
Confirm source dates, site identity and professional approval responsibilities. Customer estimates must not become verified site facts.
A coordinator submits an approved project inquiry and available site evidence.
Collect customer requirements, permitted site documents, survey notes and the team's readiness checklist.
Summarize confirmed facts and missing evidence, separating proposed system assumptions from approved engineering decisions.
Qualified engineering and project owners verify feasibility and scope. The workflow does not approve designs, permits or safety decisions.
Attach the accepted readiness brief to the project and assign confirmed information requests.
Measure missing survey information, scope corrections, repeated handoff questions and preparation time.
Keep the input, relevant context, review decision and final result connected. When a reviewer corrects something, use that evidence to improve the instructions or integration, then validate the change against representative cases.
The workflow stays centered on your business. The engagement determines who learns, implements and operates it.
Start with AI workflow training and the Factory Line source package. Workshop support is available when you need feedback.
Explore the $2,500 package ↗Get everything in DIY, three months of workshops, weekly team sessions and direct implementation coaching.
Explore guided implementation ↗Include all the learning and guidance, with ownership of agreed operations and major implementation decisions.
Explore managed delivery ↗Bring a process, a bottleneck, or an idea. We'll help you decide what to automate, what to keep under human review, and where to begin.