Start with a defined trigger
A facilitator authorizes review of a project or phase.
Completed phase-to-retrospective packet
This is a proposed workflow pattern. We confirm data access, permissions, integration options and review ownership with your team before implementation.
Do not infer intent or assign blame from isolated messages. Sensitive feedback needs appropriate access controls.
A facilitator authorizes review of a project or phase.
Collect permitted timeline records, participant feedback, delivery evidence and prior improvement actions.
Summarize themes and examples, preserving differing accounts and separating observation from interpretation.
The team verifies the account and agrees on a small set of owned improvement actions.
Record accepted actions with a review date and a way to evaluate whether they helped.
Measure unsupported interpretations, omitted perspectives, actionable improvements and preparation effort.
Keep the input, relevant context, review decision and final result connected. When a reviewer corrects something, use that evidence to improve the instructions or integration, then validate the change against representative cases.
The workflow stays centered on your business. The engagement determines who learns, implements and operates it.
Learn through courses, practical training and workshops. Get feedback as you apply the lessons to your own project.
Explore courses and workshops ↗Get everything in DIY, three months of workshops, weekly team sessions and direct implementation coaching.
Explore guided implementation ↗Include all the learning and guidance, with ownership of agreed operations and major implementation decisions.
Explore managed delivery ↗Looking for a course, help with a difficult problem, or someone to build a solution? Tell us where you are and what you'd like to do next.