Start with a defined trigger
An occupant or site coordinator reports a maintenance concern.
Building issue triage and handoff
This is a proposed workflow pattern. We confirm data access, permissions, integration options and review ownership with your team before implementation.
Protect access information and distinguish a probable duplicate from a confirmed one. AI must not close a request without authorized review.
An occupant or site coordinator reports a maintenance concern.
Collect permitted location and asset references, open requests, prior work and the facility's prioritization rules.
Identify possible duplicates, summarize the reported impact and draft a service handoff with missing details clearly flagged.
A facilities owner confirms urgency, asset identity and work authorization. Safety-sensitive reports follow the established escalation path.
Create the approved work request and link duplicate reports and completion evidence to the same issue.
Measure duplicate dispatches, missing location details, repeat faults and time to assigned ownership.
Keep the input, relevant context, review decision and final result connected. When a reviewer corrects something, use that evidence to improve the instructions or integration, then validate the change against representative cases.
The workflow stays centered on your business. The engagement determines who learns, implements and operates it.
Learn through courses, practical training and workshops. Get feedback as you apply the lessons to your own project.
Explore courses and workshops ↗Get everything in DIY, three months of workshops, weekly team sessions and direct implementation coaching.
Explore guided implementation ↗Include all the learning and guidance, with ownership of agreed operations and major implementation decisions.
Explore managed delivery ↗Looking for a course, help with a difficult problem, or someone to build a solution? Tell us where you are and what you'd like to do next.