Skip to Content

Example 1: Inventory Management

Compare poor vs better specification approaches

Poor Specification

Project: Inventory System We need a system to manage our inventory better. The current spreadsheet system is not working well. Requirements: - Track products and quantities - Show alerts for low stock - Generate reports - User-friendly interface - Should be fast - Integration with existing systems - Mobile compatible - Secure and reliable Users: Warehouse staff, managers, and accounting team will use this. Timeline: ASAP - this is urgent Budget: Reasonable cost

❌ Problems with this spec:

  • No specific numbers or metrics
  • Vague terms like "better", "user-friendly", "fast"
  • No clear success criteria
  • Missing business context
  • Undefined integrations
  • No priority levels

Better Specification

Project: Inventory Management System Business Context: We manage 500+ SKUs across 3 warehouses. Currently using Excel, causing 15% stockout rate and $50K/month in rush orders. Requirements (Prioritized): [MUST] Track quantities by SKU and location [MUST] Alert when stock < 2 weeks average sales [MUST] Daily inventory valuation report (PDF) [MUST] Response time < 2 seconds for searches [MUST] Mobile app for warehouse scanning [SHOULD] Integration with Odoo Sales (REST API) [NICE] Predictive reorder suggestions Users & Actions: - Warehouse Staff (10): Scan receipts, perform counts - Managers (3): View dashboards, approve transfers - Accounting (2): Run valuation reports Success Criteria: - Reduce stockouts to <5% within 3 months - Process 100+ transactions per hour - 90% user adoption without training

✓ Why this is better:

  • Specific numbers and measurable goals
  • Clear business context and ROI
  • Prioritized requirements (MoSCoW)
  • Defined user roles and actions
  • Explicit integration details
  • Testable success criteria

💡 Key Takeaway

Both specifications are similar in length (~200 words), but the better version provides 10x more actionable information. It's not about writing more - it's about replacing vague statements with specific, measurable requirements that developers can actually implement and test.