Start with a defined trigger
An authorized intake team receives a prospective matter submission.
Matter intake completeness review
This is a proposed workflow pattern. We confirm data access, permissions, integration options and review ownership with your team before implementation.
Confirm confidentiality, retention and approved tool use before processing matter information. Keep legal advice and acceptance decisions outside automated authority.
An authorized intake team receives a prospective matter submission.
Collect the submitted facts, the firm's intake checklist and permitted administrative reference information.
Prepare a structured intake summary and identify missing parties, dates or documents without offering legal conclusions.
Authorized staff verify the facts and attorneys handle conflict, engagement and substantive legal decisions.
Route the approved packet through the firm's existing intake process with access restricted to the appropriate team.
Measure factual errors, missing intake items, review effort and improper disclosure risks identified during evaluation.
Keep the input, relevant context, review decision and final result connected. When a reviewer corrects something, use that evidence to improve the instructions or integration, then validate the change against representative cases.
The workflow stays centered on your business. The engagement determines who learns, implements and operates it.
Learn through courses, practical training and workshops. Get feedback as you apply the lessons to your own project.
Explore courses and workshops ↗Get everything in DIY, three months of workshops, weekly team sessions and direct implementation coaching.
Explore guided implementation ↗Include all the learning and guidance, with ownership of agreed operations and major implementation decisions.
Explore managed delivery ↗Looking for a course, help with a difficult problem, or someone to build a solution? Tell us where you are and what you'd like to do next.