Start with a defined trigger
A program owner begins a defined funder or internal reporting cycle.
Program evidence-to-report draft
This is a proposed workflow pattern. We confirm data access, permissions, integration options and review ownership with your team before implementation.
Protect beneficiary information and honor funder-specific requirements. Do not turn anecdotal observations into measured outcomes.
A program owner begins a defined funder or internal reporting cycle.
Gather approved activity records, verified measures, reporting requirements and the relevant funding agreement references.
Draft a report structure and evidence-linked narrative, marking missing figures and unsupported claims for review.
Program and finance owners verify outcomes, spending references and commitments before submission.
Store the approved report and supporting evidence with the funding or program record.
Measure unsupported impact claims, missing evidence, review effort and time to an approved report.
Keep the input, relevant context, review decision and final result connected. When a reviewer corrects something, use that evidence to improve the instructions or integration, then validate the change against representative cases.
The workflow stays centered on your business. The engagement determines who learns, implements and operates it.
Learn through courses, practical training and workshops. Get feedback as you apply the lessons to your own project.
Explore courses and workshops ↗Get everything in DIY, three months of workshops, weekly team sessions and direct implementation coaching.
Explore guided implementation ↗Include all the learning and guidance, with ownership of agreed operations and major implementation decisions.
Explore managed delivery ↗Looking for a course, help with a difficult problem, or someone to build a solution? Tell us where you are and what you'd like to do next.